

Personally, my own workflow requires i start with a coarse program -like LR- to organize, pre-screen, and make universal edits. There are no simple answers, only intelligent choices.
Corel aftershot pro 3 vs picasa professional#
Will you benefit most from a lone wolf workflow, or from working in a team where photos are regularly delivered to others for further processing or professional output? To be honest, it took me a lot of time to automate LR to get to this point, but it has paid off.Ĭonsider this: creating is one thing, organizing thousands and thousands of files another.ĭo you use fine sandpaper to do your coarse sanding, or coarse sandpaper to do your fine sanding?ĭo you run a photo mill or are you studying to be a fine art photographer? Between pressing the import button on the import dialog and pressing the Publish button on the Publishing panel, most of the time all I do in LR is cull my mistakes, add keywords, titles and captions and crop the final image to the requirements of the final venue. Beyond the basic develop preset that I apply on import and a crop for composition, I do very little additional post processing, making it very quick too. And simple to use with NEFs from the D800. I find that I use LR for 97% of my image post processing and 100% of my image asset management. LR is a paradigm shift from your typical pixel pushing that you see in most image editors and it takes an open mind to develop your workflow in a way that takes advantage of LRs power. I came back to LR for the DAM and with new eyes realized the efficiencies of a non destructive editor. I tried combining several that we're not LR and several RAW image post processing tools.

As I progressed with photos more and more I began to realize the need for image asset management. I actually tried but gave up on LR1 beta as being too complex.
Corel aftershot pro 3 vs picasa software#
Thanks, I know photoshop will do what I need, I have not really needed any processing software in the past, Capture NX seems to be less creative than PS.

Tried LR, interface learning curve too steep. I use both extensively, and sometimes Capture NX2. Photoshop CS6 and Lightroom 4 are the best ones. I have always used NX2 and APERTURE on a regular basis but have now gone totally LR4 along with a Photomatix Pro 4.1 plug-in.Īs always. I wish to try IR photography, Capture NX2 doesn't seem to have the colour swopping function - but I only downloaded the trial. Wanting to "use" the D800 more experimentally, what is a good all round software package? After many years of photography, I've never used any editing software other than View NX.
